NYC Rent-Stabilized Compliance Guide

MCI And IAI Rent Increases: What NYC Owners Can Still File

An owner-side guide to major capital improvements, individual apartment improvements, HCR filings, documentation, rent record updates, and the Yardi data checks that should happen before improvement-related rent changes move forward.

Updated May 14, 2026 MCI, IAI, rent records, documentation, and Yardi data readiness

MCI and IAI rent increases are two separate improvement-related workflows in New York rent-stabilized housing. A major capital improvement is generally tied to a building-wide improvement. An individual apartment improvement is tied to work inside a specific apartment. Both can affect rent records, but they have different filing paths, documentation requirements, approval rules, and operational risks.

This guide is written for owner-side teams, managing agents, property managers, compliance teams, accounting teams, leasing teams, asset managers, and Yardi administrators working with New York rent-stabilized portfolios. It is operational guidance, not legal advice. Owners should verify current HCR instructions, counsel guidance, and case-specific facts before making improvement-related rent decisions.

Use it alongside the NYC rent-stabilized rent increase rules guide, the legal rent vs. preferential rent guide, the 421-a surcharge guide, and the DHCR owner forms library. Those resources cover adjacent workflows; MCI and IAI review focuses on improvement records and rent-history support.

Key Takeaways

What owners should know before relying on an MCI or IAI rent increase

  • MCI and IAI are not interchangeable. MCI is building-wide improvement review; IAI is apartment-level improvement review.
  • HCR Fact Sheet #24 describes MCI rent increases as an application process with tenant notice, tenant response rights, and DHCR review.
  • HCR's revised IAI operational bulletin applies to IAIs completed after October 17, 2024 and includes ORRA notification and documentation requirements.
  • The owner-side risk is not only the calculation. It is whether the records, approvals, rent history, and supporting documentation can be traced later.
  • For teams using Yardi, improvement-related rent review should connect property, unit, tenant, lease, rent, approval, reporting, and document records.
Chapter 1

MCI vs. IAI

The simplest way to separate the two workflows is scope. An MCI is tied to a building-wide improvement, installation, or replacement. An IAI is tied to work performed inside an individual apartment. Both may involve rent-stabilized rent records, but they answer different questions.

HCR's Apartment Improvements and Building Improvements overview explains the distinction: owners of rent-regulated buildings may apply to increase legal regulated rents based on certain improvements, with MCIs focused on building-wide improvements and IAIs focused on apartment-specific improvements.

For owner-side teams, the most important step is to keep the workflows separate before anything reaches the rent roll, renewal process, resident communication, or reporting package. If MCI and IAI are mixed together in one review process, it becomes harder to prove which rule, source record, approval path, and document set supported the rent record change.

Workflow Plain-English Meaning Owner-Side Review Point
MCI Major capital improvement affecting the building as a whole. Confirm building-wide scope, useful life, filing timing, tenant notice, and DHCR order status.
IAI Individual apartment improvement tied to a specific apartment. Confirm apartment status, consent requirements, cost cap, ORRA notification, photos, invoices, and proof of payment.
RGB renewal increase Annual renewal-rate adjustment for rent-stabilized leases. Keep separate from improvement-related increases and verify the applicable RGB order.
421-a surcharge Tax-benefit-related surcharge workflow. Keep separate from MCI, IAI, and RGB renewal-rate review.
Chapter 2

What Qualifies as an MCI

HCR's Fact Sheet #24: Major Capital Improvements describes an MCI as a building-wide improvement, installation, or replacement that an owner may apply for after completing qualifying work. The fact sheet says a qualifying MCI must generally be depreciable under the Internal Revenue Code, be for operation, preservation, or maintenance of the building, directly or indirectly benefit all tenants, and meet useful-life requirements.

That creates an approval workflow, not just a data-entry workflow. The owner needs to know what work was completed, when it was completed, whether the work meets the public criteria, whether the application timing is still available, how tenants were notified, and whether DHCR issued an order approving the increase.

Fact Sheet #24 also notes tenant notice and response rights. That matters operationally because the records supporting the application may need to be assembled, explained, and retained long after the physical work is complete. The improvement record, tenant communication, approval order, rent history, and property reporting should all point to the same story.

Operational caution: an MCI should not be treated as a normal rent roll adjustment. It is a building-wide improvement filing with source records, tenant notice, agency review, and long-term rent-history implications.

MCI questions to answer before rent records change

  • What building-wide work was completed, and when was it completed?
  • Does the work meet current HCR criteria for an MCI?
  • Was the application filed within the required timing window?
  • Were tenants notified, and where are those records stored?
  • Has DHCR issued an order, and is that order attached to the internal record?
  • Which rent records, reports, and billing workflows need to reflect the final approved treatment?
Chapter 3

What Qualifies as an IAI

An IAI is apartment-specific improvement work. The review starts with the apartment, not the building. Owners need to confirm what work was completed, which apartment it affected, whether the apartment was occupied or vacant, which consent rules apply, what documentation supports the work, and how the resulting rent record should be handled.

HCR's Revised Operational Bulletin 2024-2 says owners must file an IAI Notification Form in ORRA for IAIs completed after October 17, 2024. It also describes supporting documentation such as before-and-after photos, itemized invoices, contractor or vendor information, and proof of payment.

The apartment-level nature of IAI review makes recordkeeping especially important. The rent history, lease file, tenant consent record, work documentation, invoice support, payment proof, and ORRA notification should all be connected. If the documentation lives outside the core workflow, the team may struggle later when a renewal, resident inquiry, audit request, or portfolio review brings the rent record back into focus.

IAI questions to answer before rent records change

  • Which apartment received the improvement work?
  • Was the apartment occupied or vacant when the work was performed?
  • Which HCR consent form or notification requirement applies?
  • Are before-and-after photos, invoices, vendor records, and payment proof retained?
  • Has the ORRA notification been filed when required?
  • Where will the final support live so future teams can explain the rent record?
Chapter 4

What Changed After October 17, 2024

HCR's revised IAI guidance applies to IAIs completed after October 17, 2024. The revised bulletin should be checked directly before an owner relies on any IAI process, because the requirements are specific and the supporting documentation matters.

The revised bulletin describes a lower cost-cap tier and a higher cost-cap tier, with different rules depending on apartment history and building size. It also explains that the higher cap tier can be used only once in a 25-year period for a given apartment. Owners should confirm current HCR guidance before calculating or applying any increase.

For operating teams, the point is not to memorize every number in isolation. The point is to build a review path that preserves the facts: apartment status, vacancy history, consent records, cost support, calculation support, approval ownership, ORRA notification, lease records, and document retention. If the support is scattered, the rent record becomes harder to explain later.

IAI Review Area Why It Matters Record to Preserve
Completion date Determines which guidance applies. Work order, invoice, completion support, and review note.
Apartment status Affects consent and cap review. Occupancy, lease, vacancy, and registration history.
Cost support Supports the improvement claim and calculation path. Itemized invoices, vendor details, checks, and proof of payment.
ORRA notification Creates the filing trail required under current guidance. Notification confirmation, filed form, and internal approval record.

Do not rely on stale internal notes: IAI rules changed materially for work completed after October 17, 2024. Teams should verify current HCR instructions before using an older checklist or legacy spreadsheet.

Chapter 5

Documentation Owners Should Preserve

MCI and IAI work can fail operational review even when the team believes the underlying improvement was real. The issue is often the record trail. A future reviewer may ask what work was done, who approved it, which rule applied, which tenants were affected, what amount was used, and where the support lives.

HCR's revised IAI bulletin specifically names documentation such as before-and-after photos, itemized invoices, contractor or vendor information, and checks or payment proof. MCI review has its own support path tied to building-wide work, application timing, tenant notice, tenant response, and DHCR orders. Both workflows need a complete file, not just a rent field update.

Strong documentation also protects the operating team. When records are complete, leasing can answer resident questions, accounting can trace billing, compliance can verify requirements, and asset management can understand the portfolio impact. When records are incomplete, every question becomes a reconstruction project.

Improvement scope, dates, building or apartment affected, and vendor details.
Invoices, payment proof, photos, notices, consent forms, and filed forms.
Internal approval owner, calculation support, and review notes.
Final rent-history update, report validation, and document storage location.
Chapter 6

Where Yardi Records Need to Line Up

For teams using Yardi, MCI and IAI readiness depends on clean property, unit, tenant, lease, rent, charge, reporting, approval, and document records. The improvement file should not sit apart from the system records that leasing, accounting, compliance, and reporting teams rely on.

Start with the record that defines scope. For MCI, that usually means the building and affected tenant population. For IAI, that means the apartment and its occupancy history. Then review the rent fields, lease records, tenant communication, charge setup, reporting logic, and document storage. A rent-history change is only as strong as the source records behind it.

The best Yardi workflow is not a one-time correction. It is a repeatable process: identify candidate records, validate source support, assign approval ownership, update the system, attach support, test reports, and preserve the audit trail. That sequence keeps the next renewal, annual registration, resident inquiry, or portfolio review from becoming a scramble.

Record Area Why It Matters Review Question
Property and unit records Define whether MCI or IAI review applies. Are building, apartment, and status fields accurate?
Tenant and lease records Connect the rent record to the resident and package history. Do current lease, renewal, and rider records match the rent treatment?
Rent and charge setup Controls how the approved treatment appears operationally. Has the amount, start date, recurring treatment, and owner approval been verified?
Reports and documents Support future review and internal confidence. Can the team trace report output back to filed support?
Chapter 7

Common Breakdowns

MCI and IAI workflows usually break down at handoff points. Construction, property management, leasing, compliance, accounting, and reporting may all see part of the record, but no single team sees the full chain unless the process is designed that way.

One common issue is treating improvement work as complete when the physical project ends. For rent-stabilized operations, the work is not operationally complete until the filing, support, rent-history review, system update, and document trail are also complete. Another common issue is relying on a spreadsheet that identifies candidates without showing the supporting records or approval path.

When a breakdown happens, the fix should move back upstream. Correcting a report output or a billing record may solve the immediate problem, but the team should also update the source record, document storage, approval workflow, and recurring report logic so the same issue does not return during the next renewal or filing cycle.

Breakdowns to watch for

  • MCI work is tracked at the project level, but tenant notice and DHCR order records are not connected to the property file.
  • IAI invoices and payment proof exist, but apartment status and consent records are incomplete.
  • Rent fields are updated before final approval documentation is stored.
  • Reports identify candidate units, but no one owns final review before changes are made.
  • Document support lives in email, local files, or project folders that future teams cannot find.
  • Renewal, registration, and rent-history teams are not told when an improvement-related record changes.
Chapter 8

MCI And IAI Readiness Checklist

Use this checklist before relying on an MCI or IAI rent increase, preparing a rent-history update, responding to an internal review, or making a system change that affects improvement-related rent records.

  • Confirm whether the workflow is MCI, IAI, RGB renewal math, 421-a surcharge review, or another rent-stabilized process.
  • Verify current HCR guidance and case-specific legal or compliance direction before relying on an internal checklist.
  • Confirm the building, apartment, tenant, lease, and rent records affected by the improvement review.
  • For MCI, verify building-wide scope, useful life, application timing, tenant notice, tenant responses, and DHCR order status.
  • For IAI, verify apartment status, consent requirements, ORRA notification, invoices, photos, vendor records, and proof of payment.
  • Confirm the approval owner before rent fields, charge setup, or resident communication changes.
  • Attach or store supporting documents where leasing, accounting, compliance, and reporting teams can find them later.
  • Test reports against known records before relying on them as a working review list.
  • Update source records, not only spreadsheets, so future renewal and registration cycles start cleaner.
  • Document any unresolved questions for counsel or designated compliance leadership before action is taken.
FAQ

MCI And IAI Rent Increase FAQ

What is the difference between an MCI and an IAI?

An MCI is a major capital improvement that generally affects the building as a whole. An IAI is an individual apartment improvement tied to a specific apartment. Owners should review current HCR guidance before relying on either workflow.

Does an MCI require HCR approval?

HCR Fact Sheet #24 describes MCI rent increases as an application process. Tenants receive notice and may respond before DHCR issues an order if the application is approved.

Does an IAI require an ORRA notification?

HCR's revised operational bulletin for IAIs completed after October 17, 2024 describes an IAI notification form filing requirement in ORRA, along with supporting documentation such as photos, invoices, and proof of payment.

Are MCI and IAI rent increases permanent?

Current HCR materials describe MCI increases and post-October 17, 2024 IAI increases as temporary increases that must be removed from the legal regulated rent after 30 years. Owners should verify current HCR instructions and case-specific facts before making rent-history decisions.

How do MCI and IAI workflows connect to Yardi?

For teams using Yardi, MCI and IAI readiness depends on clean property, unit, tenant, lease, rent, approval, reporting, and document records. The system can support the workflow when those records are reviewed before rent history or billing changes are made.

Sources

HCR Sources to Verify Before MCI or IAI Decisions

This guide is operational guidance, not legal advice. Owners should verify current HCR instructions, required forms, filing procedures, case-specific facts, and counsel guidance before making MCI or IAI rent decisions.

Need cleaner improvement records before rent-history changes?

BC Solutions helps Yardi users align property, unit, tenant, lease, rent, approval, reporting, and document workflows before MCI or IAI records become renewal, registration, resident, or audit cleanup.

Talk to an Expert